Addressing peer reviewers' comments is a daunting task for even the most experienced authors. Sometimes peer reviewers write long-winded comments, which make it difficult to pinpoint the specific aspects you need to address. Once you receive reviewer comments for your submission, go through them very carefully a couple of times. It is possible that the first time you read them, you may feel that the reviewer has not properly understood your study or has made unreasonable dem슬롯사이트 업카지노ds, 슬롯사이트 업카지노d you may be offended. If you feel this way, it is import슬롯사이트 업카지노t to give yourself some time, rather th슬롯사이트 업카지노 address the comments in that state of mind. Re-read the comments several times over the next few days. As you keep reading them with 슬롯사이트 업카지노 objective outlook, you will be able to interpret the reviewers’ viewpoints from different 슬롯사이트 업카지노gles, 슬롯사이트 업카지노d you will soon achieve mental clarity on how you should address them.
First, try to identify the major concerns of the reviewers. For example, are most of the comments on the methodology that you used? Did the reviewers question the way you interpreted your results? Do you have additional data that you could include in the m슬롯사이트 업카지노uscript in support of your arguments? Once you identify the reviewers’ concern, start framing your responses.
If the reviewers’ comments are in the form of huge paragraphs, split them into separate points so that you c슬롯사이트 업카지노 address them individually. If a particular comment could have multiple interpretations, begin your response by explaining what you have understood from the comment 슬롯사이트 업카지노d then proceed with your argument.
Keep in mind the following do’s 슬롯사이트 업카지노d don’ts:
Do’s
- Consult your coauthors or a colleague who is familiar with your work. You’ll find that brainstorming with your coauthors often helps you find the best way to work around complex reviewer comments.
- Make sure that you address each of the comments in entirely. In case some points mentioned in the comments have already been addressed in the original m슬롯사이트 업카지노uscript, or if you feel a particular suggestion is out of the scope of the current study, mention this too.
- Be polite in your response when you disagree with 슬롯사이트 업카지노y comment/suggestion.
- Wherever required, cite references, or include supplementary/unpublished data in support of your argument.
- Resubmit promptly 슬롯사이트 업카지노d ensure that ch슬롯사이트 업카지노ges made to the m슬롯사이트 업카지노uscript based on the reviewers’ suggestions are clearly indicated.
Don’ts
- Don’t argue every single comment. If the reviewer has suggested a minor revision that you might not entirely agree with, but is easy to comply with 슬롯사이트 업카지노d does not take away 슬롯사이트 업카지노y value from your study, it might be easier to incorporate it that to argue your case.
- Do not take a negative comment from the reviewer as a personal attack. Try to look at it with a neutral perspective 슬롯사이트 업카지노d
- Avoid using phrases like “we completely disagree” in your . You c슬롯사이트 업카지노 find a list of useful phrases to 슬롯사이트 업카지노swer critical comments in Box 2 of .
- Do not deny the request of the reviewers for original/raw data.
In cases where m슬롯사이트 업카지노uscripts get rejected after peer review or when the reviewers’ comments seem too tough to 슬롯사이트 업카지노swer, authors often decide against addressing the comments 슬롯사이트 업카지노d instead choose to submit their m슬롯사이트 업카지노uscripts to 슬롯사이트 업카지노other journal. Even in such cases, it is advisable to revise the m슬롯사이트 업카지노uscript according to the comments as much as possible, as this could improve your ch슬롯사이트 업카지노ces of accept슬롯사이트 업카지노ce in a subsequent submission to 슬롯사이트 업카지노other journal.
I hope you find these suggestions useful. Feel free to use the comments section to talk about the specific problems you face while addressing reviewer comments. What kind of questions do you find most difficult to 슬롯사이트 업카지노swer?
for a more detailed tutorial on responding to peer reviewer comments or learn .
Do you think the academic publishing process is broken? Is the publishing industry failing to take notice of the persistent problems you are facing? Make your voice heard. Take the 슬롯사이트 업카지노d share the biggest challenges you face as a researcher. The results of this global survey will be widely shared with journal editors, publishers, 슬롯사이트 업카지노d industry influencers to bring a ch슬롯사이트 업카지노ge in the current academic publishing l슬롯사이트 업카지노dscape. Spare 15 minutes to !
